The ADT (Adult DVD Talk) topic was “why we never see women being eaten out in porn” – and my pal Faceblaster just showed me a post by a fellow calling himself Lazerous:
For a generation or so now–let’s say post-Max Hardcore–the wall-to-wall/all-sex porn genres have been increasingly oblivious to depictions of female pleasure, including any act leading up to or resulting in female orgasm.
So what we have now is a lot of young, passive, robotic “fuck dolls” who exist only to be receptacles for cocks and sperm (or as Max liked to call them, “cock-sockets”). Sexual fulfillment for the female in these videos is insignificant, and certainly never pursued. Any acts that show the female as anything but an obedient slave to the desires and fulfillment of the man or men in the scene fucks up this fantasy recipe. So they don’t often occur, except in those cases where a female performer is actually aroused by this type of role-playing.
On the other hand, most of the women who work as models in hardcore these days are perfectly happy not to pursue their own pleasure in front of the camera–they have no interest in kissing their co-stars, let alone sharing real orgasms with them (or the viewer). So the idea of being eaten out is as pointless to them as it is to the studs or the director; there is an unstated understanding that this isn’t about female orgasm to begin with (that, of course, has become its own specialty genre in porn). Also, many of these girls are very young, and seem to be pretty out of touch with their own bodies during the action. And they can’t be in touch with their co-stars’ bodies too easily, because the men are only disembodied penises (you may notice that in current wall-to-wall, women rarely kiss, lick, bite, or caress their partner’s bodies during the action–except for their cocks).
Add to that the practice of making the girls only look at the camera rather than their partner during the scenes, and you have the formula for what I call Cock Chauvinist porno. The test for whether you are watching a practitioner of CC (for short) porno is simple: once the explicit action begins (skip the tease stuff), the erect cock must be in the center of the shot at all times. It can never leave the center of the screen no matter what happens, and the only time from this point till the conclusion of the scene that we can see the girl’s pussy, face, tits, ass, or any other part of her anatomy is when it is attached to that cock.
(Obviously, I’m painting with a broad brush here, so forgive me for the exceptions you can think of in the wall-to-wall marketplace; on the other hand, I would guess that most of the best scenes you’ve watched in wall-to-wall porn departed from this formula? Unless, of course, this is the fantasy you watch porn to see.)
By the way, if the girls in these videos are “whores,” it is because they have traded in their own pleasure and orgasm for the role of being a cock attachment. That, rather than taking money for sex, has become the criteria for “whores” in porn these days.
To which I reply:
Lazerous is corrrect, up to a point…the whole recent (maybe not-so-recent as Artie Mitchell’s porno masterpiece The Grafenberg Spot is now coming up on 21 years old) squirting internet phenom he failed to mention…but, yea, all-in-all I’d have to agree wholeheartedly with everything he wrote. I will also add this – I know, first hand, of girls who refuse to get off on camera.
You read right…porno girls who refuse to have an on-camera orgasm…why?
It’s too personal.
They don’t want to reveal that much of themselves on camera. Oh sure, they’ll get naked, suck cock, get plowed in the ass, and let 15 guys jizz all over their face…but they won’t cum. No way.
And just when you thought these porno chicks were really nutty, I toss this one yer way.
“They don’t want to reveal that much of themselves on camera. Oh sure, they’ll get naked, suck cock, get plowed in the ass, and let 15 guys jizz all over their face…but they won’t cum. No way.
And just when you thought these porno chicks were really nutty, I toss this one yer way.”
I wonder if they’d be quite as reluctant if bonuses were paid out for it. The problem, of course, is getting customers to pay extra for this stuff.